President Donald Trump’s low approval ratings, economic record and decision to make himself the centre of the Republican campaign are creating mounting challenges for GOP candidates ahead of the November 3 midterm elections.
Rather than allowing vulnerable Republicans to distance themselves from the White House, Trump has urged voters to treat the midterms as though he were personally on the ballot.
He has launched an intensive campaign tour and is appearing at rallies to mobilise his political base, but recent polling and developments in competitive races show that his presence is also forcing Republican candidates to navigate voter dissatisfaction with his administration.
Trump’s approval becomes a Republican problem
Trump’s approval rating has fallen to levels that are creating difficulties for Republicans fighting to retain their congressional majorities.
Economic concerns have become particularly damaging. An AP-NORC poll found that only 26 percent of Americans approved of Trump’s handling of the economy, while 65 percent said he was responsible for persistent high living costs. Democrats also held an advantage over Republicans among voters asked which party was better equipped to address the cost of living.
The economic pressure comes as Americans face higher fuel prices and continued concern about household costs.
For Republican candidates in competitive districts and states, the problem is that many of the issues driving voter dissatisfaction are directly associated with Trump’s administration.
READ ALSO: Trump excludes CNN, MS NOW, Politico from White House coverage
Iran war pushes fuel prices higher
The prolonged US military campaign against Iran has added another complication for Republicans.
Rising fuel prices have become a major political concern, with Republican candidates in some competitive races beginning to distance themselves from Trump’s position on the conflict and calling for an end to the war.
Related Articles
Both Mike Rogers, locked in a competitive race against Democrat Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan, and Ashley Hinson, who is facing Democrat Josh Turek in a close contest in Iowa, struck a more dovish tone on Iran in September, after previously backing Trump’s authority to strike Tehran, according to Reuters.
The issue is particularly sensitive because Republicans are trying to defend their economic record while voters contend with higher costs.
The growing tension has created an unusual situation in which some GOP candidates are campaigning on their own records while simultaneously trying to avoid being too closely identified with unpopular aspects of Trump’s foreign policy.
READ ALSO: US launches fresh strikes on Iran as Trump declares ceasefire over
GOP forced to defend traditionally safe seats
The pressure is no longer confined to the most competitive battlegrounds.
Republican campaign organisations have begun moving money into dozens of House races that were previously regarded as relatively safe.
Reuters reported that major Republican groups and donors had deployed money in at least 39 additional congressional races since September 1 after internal polling indicated that candidates in traditionally Republican districts could face stronger challenges than expected.
The party’s financial response illustrates the concern among Republican strategists that voters could use the midterms to register dissatisfaction with Trump and his policies.
Senate races also tightening
Republican groups are similarly being forced to reassess Senate contests.
In North Carolina, the Senate Leadership Fund has suspended further advertising spending after investing more than $32 million in the race and redirected resources towards Kansas, where Republican Senator, Roger Marshall, faces a stronger-than-expected Democratic challenge.
Related Articles
The moves demonstrate how Republican campaign strategists are reallocating resources as the electoral map becomes more competitive.
READ ALSO: Trump image to feature on special US passport for 250th annniversary celebrations
Trump wants the election centred on him
Trump, however, is taking the opposite approach from Republicans who want to separate themselves from the White House.
He has repeatedly encouraged his supporters to view the election as a referendum on his presidency and has made Republican control of Congress a central theme of his campaign appearances.
Trump has also offered financial incentives to voters, including a proposed $5,000 payment to American adults if Republicans retain control of Congress. The proposal has drawn attention because of its potential cost and questions over how it would be financed.
His campaign strategy is designed to energise his core supporters, but it also keeps his record at the centre of races involving Republican candidates who may prefer to focus on local issues.
Republicans caught between Trump and swing voters
The result is a strategic dilemma for the GOP.
Trump remains capable of mobilising Republican voters, but candidates in competitive races also have to appeal to independents and voters dissatisfied with the administration.
Some Republicans have consequently begun breaking with Trump on specific issues, including immigration, the Iran conflict and presidential war powers.
At the same time, Republican leaders are pouring money into races once considered secure, suggesting that the party is preparing for a broader contest than initially expected.
The November elections will determine control of Congress. Current polling and campaign spending provide evidence of a difficult environment for Republicans, but they do not determine the final result.
For now, Trump’s central role in the campaign has created both an organising advantage for the Republican base and a political liability for candidates attempting to win over voters unhappy with the president’s record.
