A woman has sparked reactions on social media after questioning the idea that a man has used a woman for sex simply because he ended their relationship after they had consensual sexual intercourse.
In a viral video circulating online, the lady argued that when two adults willingly agree to engage in sexual activities, neither party should automatically be accused of using the other for sexual gratification because the relationship did not develop as expected.
She maintained that consensual sexual intercourse involves mutual agreement and participation, insisting that a relationship ending after intimacy does not necessarily mean one person exploited the other.
‘You used each other for sexual gratification’
Explaining her position, the woman said people should distinguish between consensual sexual activity and situations involving coercion or a lack of consent.
“You had sex with me and you dumped me. You both had consensual sex. That’s how it happens,” she said.
She further argued that when both parties willingly agree to have sex without coercion, the experience should not automatically be described as one person taking advantage of the other.
According to her, the circumstances surrounding the encounter matter when determining whether someone was genuinely exploited.
The lady went on to describe a situation in which two people voluntarily visit each other, remove their clothes and engage in sexual activities by mutual agreement.
“But you both consensually removed your clothes. You opened your legs. And then you guys did whatever sexual activity you desired to do,” she said.
Lady questions claims of sexual exploitation after a breakup
The woman also challenged the argument that a man necessarily used a woman for sex if he ended the relationship after they had been intimate.
“Then when you finished, you say he used me. No, you used each other for sexual gratification,” she stated.
She suggested that repeated sexual encounters between two consenting adults could indicate that both parties willingly participated in the arrangement, rather than one person necessarily exploiting the other.
“And that’s the reason why it happened multiple times after that,” she added.
Concluding her argument, the woman maintained that describing every failed romantic relationship involving sexual intimacy as a case of being used for sex does not adequately reflect the circumstances of the encounter.
“So saying a man used you for sex doesn’t make sense. Okay,” she said.
Watch the video here…
Brotherhood need to protect this lady
She said it all….Gbam pic.twitter.com/Zeg4dAZk9L— sK🌱 (@coo_kyei) October 8, 2026
